4.5 Article

Alternative Xeno-Free Biomaterials Derived from Human Umbilical Cord for the Self-Renewal Ex-vivo Expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Journal

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 3025-3038

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2013.0067

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A121965]
  2. Space Core Technology Development Program [2011-0030754]
  3. Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MEST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are attractive candidates for novel cell-therapy applications. However, the in vitro expansion of MSCs typically depends on the presence of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and coating materials derived from animal sources, which may cause contamination in clinical applications. In this study, we investigated whether human umbilical cord extract (UCE) could serve as a serum replacement and whether collagen purified from umbilical cord (UC-collagen) could act as an extracellular matrix (ECM) for the in vitro culture of MSCs derived from human UC (UC-MSCs). A total of 5.61 +/- 0.54mg UCE and 18.41 +/- 2.42mg collagen were extracted, and 1.3 +/- 0.2x10(5) cells were isolated from 1g of UC, as determined by the expression of typical MSC surface markers. Importantly, the proliferation and stemness of the UC-MSCs cultured with the UCE media were similar to those cultured under FBS conditions on UC-collagen-treated plates for eight passages. Based on these results, we suggest that UCs, which are discarded as medical waste, represent a viable alternative source of xeno-free biomaterials to replace animal-derived serum and ECM materials for the cultivation of various cell types, including UC-MSCs, adipose tissue-derived MSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs, and fibroblasts. This innovative xeno-free MSCs culture system can overcome many of the problems associated with immunogenicity, and it will further contribute to the enhancement of treatment efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available