4.5 Article

Efficacy Assessment of Interferon-Alpha-Engineered Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in a Mouse Plasmacytoma Model

Journal

STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 709-719

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2010.0095

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research
  2. Fondazione CARIVERONA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) may survive and proliferate in the presence of cycling neoplastic cells. Exogenously administered MSCs are actively incorporated in the tumor as stromal fibroblasts, thus competing with the local mesenchymal cell precursors. For this reason, MSCs have been suggested as a suitable carrier for gene therapy strategies, as they can be genetically engineered with genes encoding for biologically active molecules that can inhibit tumor cell proliferation and enhance the antitumor immune response. We used BM-MSCs engineered with the murine interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) gene (BM-MSCs/IFN-alpha) to assess in a mouse plasmacytoma model the efficacy of this approach toward neoplastic plasma cells. We found that IFN-alpha can be efficiently produced and delivered inside the tumor microenvironment. Subcutaneous multiple administration of BM-MSCs/IFN-alpha significantly hampered the tumor growth in vivo and prolonged the overall survival of mice. The antitumor effect was associated with enhanced apoptosis of tumor cells, reduction in microvessel density, and ischemic necrosis. By contrast, intravenous administration of BM-MSCs/IFN-alpha did not significantly modify the survival of mice, mainly as a consequence of an excessive entrapment of injected cells in the pulmonary vessels. In conclusion, BM-MSCs/IFN-alpha are effective in inhibiting neoplastic plasma cell growth; however, systemic administration of engineered MSCs needs to be improved to make this approach potentially suitable for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available