4.7 Article

Brief Reports: A Distinct DNA Methylation Signature Defines Breast Cancer Stem Cells and Predicts Cancer Outcome

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 3031-3036

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1792

Keywords

Breast cancer; Cancer stem cells; Methylation; Differentiation

Funding

  1. Inserm
  2. Institut Paoli-Calmettes
  3. SIRIC [INCa-DGOS-Inserm 6038]
  4. IVOIRES (INCa-PL-BIO)
  5. GEFLUC
  6. Ligue National Contre le Cancer
  7. Ministry of Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-renewal and differentiation are two epigenetic programs that regulate stem cells fate. Dysregulation of these two programs leads to the development of cancer stem cells (CSCs). Recent evidence suggests that CSCs are relatively resistant to conventional therapies and responsible for metastasis formation. Deciphering these processes will help understand oncogenesis and allow the development of new targeted therapies. Here, we have used a whole genome promoter microarray to establish the DNA methylation portraits of breast cancer stem cells (bCSCs) and non-bCSCs. A total of 68 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were more hypomethylated in bCSCs than in non-bCSCs. Using a differentiation assay we demonstrated that DMRs are rapidly hypermethylated within the first 6 hours following induction of CSC differentiation whereas the cells reached the steady-state within 6 days, suggesting that these DMRs are linked to early CSC epigenetic regulation. These DMRs were significantly enriched in genes coding for TGF-beta signaling-related proteins. Interestingly, DMRs hypomethylation was correlated to an overexpression of TGF-beta signaling genes in a series of 109 breast tumors. Moreover, patients with tumors harboring the bCSC DMRs signature had a worse prognosis than those with non-bCSC DMRs signature. Our results show that bCSCs have a distinct DNA methylation landscape with TGF-beta signaling as a key epigenetic regulator of bCSCs differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available