4.7 Article

CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein Beta Is Expressed in Satellite Cells and Controls Myogenesis

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 2619-2630

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1248

Keywords

Muscle development; Satellite cells; Skeletal muscle; MyoD1 myogenic differentiation protein; CCAAT-enhancer binding protein beta

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Cancer Research Society
  3. University of Ottawa's Research Development Program
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  5. NICHD
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Johnson Johnson
  8. Blueprint

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upon injury, muscle satellite cells become activated and produce skeletal muscle precursors that engage in myogenesis. We demonstrate that the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) is expressed in the satellite cells of healthy muscle. C/EBP beta expression is regulated during myogenesis such that C/EBP beta is rapidly and massively downregulated upon induction to differentiate. Furthermore, persistent expression of C/EBP beta in myoblasts potently inhibits differentiation at least in part through the inhibition of MyoD protein function and stability. As a consequence, myogenic factor expression, myosin heavy chain expression, and fusogenic activity were reduced in C/EBP beta-overexpressing cells. Using knockout models, we demonstrate that loss of Cebpb expression in satellite cells results in precocious differentiation of myoblasts in growth conditions and greater cell fusion upon differentiation. In vivo, loss of Cebpb expression in satellite cells resulted in larger muscle fiber cross-sectional area and improved repair after muscle injury. Our results support the notion that C/EBP beta inhibits myogenic differentiation and that its levels must be reduced to allow for activation of MyoD target genes and the progression of differentiation. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 2619-2630

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available