4.7 Article

Effective Elimination of Cancer Stem Cells By a Novel Drug Combination Strategy

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 23-34

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1273

Keywords

Glioma; Hypoxia; Chemotherapy; Drug target; Toxicity

Funding

  1. major science and technology project of the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2012CB967004]
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA085563, CA100428, CA16672]
  3. grant for the CLL Global Research Foundation
  4. MD Anderson Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of effective therapeutic strategies to eliminate cancer stem cells, which play a major role in drug resistance and disease recurrence, is critical to improve cancer treatment outcomes. Our study showed that glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) exhibited low mitochondrial respiration and high glycolytic activity. These GSCs were highly resistant to standard drugs such as carmustine and temozolomide (TMZ), but showed high sensitivity to a glycolytic inhibitor 3-bromo-2-oxopropionate-1-propyl ester (3-BrOP), especially under hypoxic conditions. We further showed that combination of 3-BrOP with carmustine but not with TMZ achieved a striking synergistic effect and effectively killed GSCs through a rapid depletion of cellular ATP and inhibition of carmustine-induced DNA repair. This drug combination significantly impaired the sphere-forming ability of GSCs in vitro and tumor formation in vivo, leading to increase in the overall survival of mice bearing orthotopic inoculation of GSCs. Further mechanistic study showed that 3-BrOP and carmustine inhibited glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and caused a severe energy crisis in GSCs. Our study suggests that GSCs are highly glycolytic and that certain drug combination strategies can be used to effectively overcome their drug resistance based on their metabolic properties. STEM CELLS 2013;31:23-34

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available