4.7 Article

Epigenetic Reprogramming by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Primates

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1255-1264

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.60

Keywords

Reprogramming; Nuclear transfer; Embryonic stem cells; Primates

Funding

  1. Oregon National Primate Research Center
  2. Oregon Stem Cell Center
  3. NIH [HD18185, RR00163, NS044330]
  4. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD057121] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [U54HD018185, P30HD018185] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P51RR000168, K01RR000163, P51RR000163] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS044330] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently demonstrated that somatic cells from adult primates could be reprogrammed into a pluripotent state by somatic cell nuclear transfer. However, the low efficiency with donor cells from one monkey necessitated the need for large oocyte numbers. Here, we demonstrate nearly threefold higher blastocyst development and embryonic stem (ES) cell derivation rates with different nuclear donor cells. Two ES cell lines were isolated using adult female rhesus macaque skin fibroblasts as nuclear donors and oocytes retrieved from one female, following a single controlled ovarian stimulation. In addition to routine pluripotency tests involving in vitro and in vivo differentiation into various somatic cell types, primate ES cells derived from reprogrammed somatic cells were also capable of contributing to cells expressing markers of germ cells. Moreover, imprinted gene expression, methylation, telomere length, and X-inactivation analyses were consistent with accurate and extensive epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cells by oocyte-specific factors. STEM CELLS 2009;27:1255-1264

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available