4.7 Article

Regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency by Sox2 in human embryonic stem cells

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1931-1938

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-1002

Keywords

human embryonic stem cells; RNA interference; Sox2; Oct4; Nanog; differentiation; self-renewal; pluripotency

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD46765, HD49488] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [2T32GM07814] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells, derived from blastocysts, are capable of unlimited self-renewal and differentiation into all cell lineages of the body. Because of their pluripotent nature, hES cells are valuable tools for understanding human development and advancing the field of regenerative medicine. However, one key to harnessing the therapeutic power of hES cells for biomedical applications begins with determining how these cells maintain their pluripotent and undifferentiated state. Studies in mice have implicated three factors in regulating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells, Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2. However, significant differences in growth regulation between mouse embryonic stem and hES cells have been identified, suggesting a need to determine when and how factors work in hES cells. To date, the transcription factors Oct4 and Nanog have been identified as critical regulators of stem cell fate by functional studies in hES cells. To determine the role of Sox2 in maintaining hES cell pluripotency and self-renewal, we used RNA interference to specifically knock down Sox2 gene expression. Reduction of Sox2 expression in hES cells results in loss of the undifferentiated stem cell state, as indicated by a change in cell morphology, altered stem cell marker expression, and increased expression of trophectoderm markers. In addition, knockdown of Sox2 results in reduced expression of several key stem cell factors, including Oct4 and Nanog, linking these three factors together in a pluripotent regulatory network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available