4.2 Article

Excess of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modifies human pluripotent stem cell differentiation

Journal

STEM CELL RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 926-937

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.06.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Council of the Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR)
  2. Singapore International Graduate Award (SINGA)
  3. Merlion grant (project Glyco-TOOLS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc), a post translational modification, has emerged as an important cue in controlling key cell mechanisms. Here, we investigate O-GlcNAc's role in the maintenance and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC). We reveal that protein expression of O-GlcNAc transferase and hydrolase both decreases during hPSC differentiation. Upregulating O-GlcNAc with O-GlcNAc hydrolase inhibitors has no significant effect on either the maintenance of pluripotency in hPSC culture, or the loss of pluripotency in differentiating hPSC. However, in spontaneously differentiating hPSC, excess O-GlcNAc alters the expression of specific lineage markers: decrease of ectoderm markers (PAX6 by 53-88%, MSX1 by 26-49%) and increase of adipose-related mesoderm markers (PPAR gamma by 28-100%, C/EBP alpha by 46-135%). All other lineage markers tested (cardiac, visceral-endoderm, trophectoderm) remain minimally affected by upregulated O-GlcNAc. Interestingly, we also show that excess O-GlcNAc triggers a feedback mechanism that increases O-GlcNAc hydrolase expression by 29-91%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that excess O-GlcNAc does not affect hPSC pluripotency in undifferentiated maintenance cultures; instead, it restricts the hPSC differentiation towards specific cell lineages. These data will be useful for developing targeted differentiation protocols and aid in understanding the effects of O-GlcNAc on hPSC differentiation. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available