Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 18, Pages 3061-3077Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6177
Keywords
diagnostic meta-analysis; publication bias; diagnostic odds ratio; trim and fill; simulation study
Categories
Funding
- DFG [HO 1286/7-2]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The present study investigates the performance of several statistical tests to detect publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis by means of simulation. While bivariate models should be used to pool data from primary studies in diagnostic meta-analysis, univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy are preferable for the purpose of detecting publication bias. In contrast to earlier research, which focused solely on the diagnostic odds ratio or its logarithm (ln omega), the tests are combined with four different univariate measures of diagnostic accuracy. For each combination of test and univariate measure, both type I error rate and statistical power are examined under diverse conditions. The results indicate that tests based on linear regression or rank correlation cannot be recommended in diagnostic meta-analysis, because type I error rates are either inflated or power is too low, irrespective of the applied univariate measure. In contrast, the combination of trim and fill and ln omega has non-inflated or only slightly inflated type I error rates and medium to high power, even under extreme circumstances (at least when the number of studies per meta-analysis is large enough). Therefore, we recommend the application of trim and fill combined with ln omega to detect funnel plot asymmetry in diagnostic meta-analysis. Copyright (C) 2014 JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available