4.5 Article

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 29, Pages 3805-3820

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5453

Keywords

generalised variance; meta-regression; multivariate methods; random effects models

Funding

  1. MRC Midlands Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham (Medical Research Council) [G0800808]
  2. UK Medical Research Council [U105260558]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0800808, MC_U105260558] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0800808, MC_U105260558] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I2 statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. It is the univariate R2 statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis. This statistic is then used to derive a multivariate analogue of I2, which we call IR2. We also provide a multivariate H2 statistic, the ratio of a generalisation of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic and its associated degrees of freedom, with an accompanying generalisation of the usual I2 statistic, IH2. Our proposed heterogeneity statistics can be used alongside all the usual estimates and inferential procedures used in multivariate meta-analysis. We apply our methods to some real datasets and show how our statistics are equally appropriate in the context of multivariate meta-regression, where study level covariate effects are included in the model. Our heterogeneity statistics may be used when applying any procedure for fitting the multivariate random effects model. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available