4.5 Article

Absolute risk regression for competing risks: interpretation, link functions, and prediction

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 29, Pages 3921-3930

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5459

Keywords

absolute risk; competing risk; cumulative incidence; prediction model; regression model

Funding

  1. Danish Natural Science Research Council [272-06-0442]
  2. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [U24-CA76518]
  3. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [U24-CA76518]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In survival analysis with competing risks, the transformation model allows different functions between the outcome and explanatory variables. However, the model's prediction accuracy and the interpretation of parameters may be sensitive to the choice of link function. We review the practical implications of different link functions for regression of the absolute risk (or cumulative incidence) of an event. Specifically, we consider models in which the regression coefficients beta have the following interpretation: The probability of dying from cause D during the next t years changes with a factor exp(beta) for a one unit change of the corresponding predictor variable, given fixed values for the other predictor variables. The models have a direct interpretation for the predictive ability of the risk factors. We propose some tools to justify the models in comparison with traditional approaches that combine a series of cause-specific Cox regression models or use the FineGray model. We illustrate the methods with the use of bone marrow transplant data. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available