4.5 Article

Application of copulas to improve covariance estimation for partial least squares

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 685-696

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5533

Keywords

copula; covariance; correlation; complete separation; neuroimaging; partial least squares

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K25 AG035062, 5T32 CAU82087-03, R01 AG018402, P50 AG005133, K02 AG001039, R01 AG020226, K02 AG027998, R01 MH070729, K01 MH001976, R37 AG025516, P01 AG025204, R01 MH64821, K24 RR18192, P50 AG005681, P01 AG003991]
  2. Alzheimer's Association [TLL-01-3381]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FD02-03 ER63590]
  4. GE Healthcare, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dimension reduction techniques, such as partial least squares, are useful for computing summary measures and examining relationships in complex settings. Partial least squares requires an estimate of the covariance matrix as a first step in the analysis, making this estimate critical to the results. In addition, the covariance matrix also forms the basis for other techniques in multivariate analysis, such as principal component analysis and independent component analysis. This paper has been motivated by an example from an imaging study in Alzheimer's disease where there is complete separation between Alzheimer's and control subjects for one of the imaging modalities. This separation occurs in one block of variables and does not occur with the second block of variables resulting in inaccurate estimates of the covariance. We propose the use of a copula to obtain estimates of the covariance in this setting, where one set of variables comes from a mixture distribution. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimator is an improvement over the standard estimators of covariance. We illustrate the methods from the motivating example from a study in the area of Alzheimer's disease. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available