Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 383-396Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4453
Keywords
bias; observational studies; Bayesian statistics; pharmacoepidemiology
Categories
Funding
- MRC [MC_UP_0801/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Medical Research Council [MC_UP_0801/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recent years have witnessed new innovation in Bayesian techniques to adjust for unmeasured confounding. A challenge with existing methods is that the user is often required to elicit prior distributions for high-dimensional parameters that model competing bias scenarios. This can render the methods unwieldy. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to adjust for unmeasured confounding that derives default priors for bias parameters for observational studies with binary covariates. The confounding effects of measured and unmeasured variables are treated as exchangeable within a Bayesian framework. We model the joint distribution of covariates by using a log-linear model with pairwise interaction terms. Hierarchical priors constrain the magnitude and direction of bias parameters. An appealing property of the method is that the conditional distribution of the unmeasured confounder follows a logistic model, giving a simple equivalence with previously proposed methods. We apply the method in a data example from pharmacoepidemiology and explore the impact of different priors for bias parameters on the analysis results. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available