Journal
STATISTICAL SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 219-236Publisher
INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/08-STS254
Keywords
cluster; contiguity; community intervention; group randomization; randomization inference; subclassification
Categories
Funding
- NICHD/NIH [P01 HD045753-02]
- Health Policy Research Program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In randomized experiments, treatment and control groups should be roughly the same-balanced-in their distributions of pretreatment variables. But how nearly so? Can descriptive comparisons meaningfully be paired with significance tests? If so, should there be several such tests, one for each pretreatment variable, or should there be a single, omnibus test? Could such a test be engineered to give easily computed p-values that are reliable in samples of moderate size, or would simulation be needed for reliable calibration? What new concerns are introduced by random assignment of clusters? Which tests of balance would be optimal? To address these questions, Fisher's randomization inference is applied to the question of balance. Its application suggests the reversal of published conclusions about two studies, one clinical and the other a field experiment in political participation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available