4.6 Article

A two-way enriched clinical trial design: combining advantages of placebo lead-in and randomized withdrawal

Journal

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 871-890

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280211431023

Keywords

placebo lead-in; placebo response; placebo run-in; randomized withdrawal; sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 CA120082-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new clinical trial design, designated the two-way enriched design (TED), is introduced, which augments the standard randomized placebo-controlled trial with second-stage enrichment designs in placebo non-responders and drug responders. The trial is run in two stages. In the first stage, patients are randomized between drug and placebo. In the second stage, placebo non-responders are re-randomized between drug and placebo and drug responders are re-randomized between drug and placebo. All first-stage data, and second-stage data from first-stage placebo non-responders and first-stage drug responders, are utilized in the efficacy analysis. The authors developed one, two and three degrees of freedom score tests for treatment effect in the TED and give formulae for asymptotic power and for sample size computations. The authors compute the optimal allocation ratio between drug and placebo in the first stage for the TED and compare the operating characteristics of the design to the standard parallel clinical trial, placebo lead-in and randomized withdrawal designs. Two motivating examples from different disease areas are presented to illustrate the possible design considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available