4.3 Article

In situ Raman microscopy of starch granule structures in wild type and ae mutant maize kernels

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 128-138

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.201000107

Keywords

ae maize; Amylose extender; Maize starch; Raman microscopy; Starch granule structure

Funding

  1. BBSRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method developed for in situ imaging of starch granule structure in dry seeds has been applied to compare the starch granule structures found in wild type and ae mutant maize kernels. In the isogenic ae mutant the activity of the starch branching enzyme IIb is inhibited, which gives rise to a high amylose starch. The granule structures in the wild type samples have been found to be homogeneous, whereas those in the ae mutant are grossly heterogeneous within individual granules, between granules within individual cells, and between cells across the endosperm. The level of heterogeneity observed in situ appears to be more marked than that previously reported for studies on isolated ae mutant starches. Iodine/potassium iodide staining and polarised light microscopy have been used together with Raman microscopy, which has allowed high-resolution mapping of the composition and physical state of the structures within the granules, to probe the origins of the heterogeneity of the starch structures. Although the mutation inhibits the activity of the branching enzyme within the granules, and both the composition and level of crystallinity within and between granules is variable, the major origin of the heterogeneity of the granule architecture appears to result from significant changes in the assembly and packaging of the crystalline structures within the granule. It is suggested that this arises due to the mutation of the starch branching enzyme introducing defects into the self-assembly of the crystalline structure, resulting in an accumulation of defects and increased randomisation of the granule structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available