4.3 Article

Production and characterization of digestion-resistant starch by the reaction of Neisseria polysaccharea amylosucrase

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 221-228

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.200900182

Keywords

Amylosucrase; Digestion-resistant starch; Elongation; Glucosyltransferring reaction; Sucrose

Funding

  1. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [20070301034008]
  2. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [20070301034008] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant amylosucrase (200 U/mL) from Neisseria polysaccharea was used to produce digestion-resistant starch (RS) using 1-3% (w/v) corn starches and 0.1-0.5 M sucrose incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 h. Characterization of the obtained enzyme-modified starches was investigated. Results show that the yields of the enzyme-modified starches were inversely proportional to the original amylose contents of corn starches. After enzymatic reaction, insoluble AS contents increased by 22.3 and 20.7% from 6.9% of waxy and 7.7% of normal corn starches, respectively, using 3.0% starch as acceptor and 0.3 M sucrose as donor, while amylomaize VII showed the lowest increase (8.5%) in RS content. The crystalline polymorph of these enzyme-modified starches resulted in the B-type immediately after enzymatic reaction. The enzyme-modified starches displayed higher melting peak temperatures (85.6-100.6 degrees C) compared to their native starch counterparts (70.1-78.4 degrees C). After enzymatic reaction, pasting temperature increased in waxy (71.9 -> 77.6 degrees C) and normal corn starches (75.3 -> 80.6 degrees C), and the peak viscosity of waxy corn starches increased from 264 to 349 RVU, whereas that of normal corn starches decreased from 235 to 66 RVU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available