4.3 Article

Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization and Characterization of Cassava Starch-graft-Poly(acrylamide)

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 18-27

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.200900157

Keywords

Cassava starch; Graft copolymerization; Response surface methodology; SEM; X-ray diffraction

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed for the synthesis of cassava starch-graft-poly(acrylamide) using ceric ammonium nitrate as free radical initiator. Concentration of acrylamide, concentration of ceric ammonium nitrate, reaction temperature and duration of reaction were optimized using a 4-factor 3-level Box-Behnken design. The dependent variables were percentage grafting (%G) and grafting efficiency (GE). Second order polynomial relationships were obtained for %G and GE, which explained the main, quadratic and interaction effects of factors. The highest%G and GE obtained were 174.8% and 90.7%, respectively. The optimum values of parameters predicted through RSM were 20 g acrylamide/10 g dry starch, 3.3 g/L ceric ammonium nitrate, 180 min reaction duration and 45 degrees C temperature with a %G of 190.0. For GE, the predicted levels of factors for the optimum value of 90.8% were 17.5 g acrylamide/10 g dry starch, 4.1 g/L ceric ammonium nitrate, 180 min reaction duration and 55 degrees C temperature. The graft reaction was confirmed by FTIR analysis, where the absorption bands corresponding to the C=O stretching and N-H bending of the -CONH2 group were observed. Scanning electron microscopic studies on grafted starches revealed that the granular structure of the starch was affected by the reaction. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the crystallinity of starch was decreased as a result of grafting and the reduction was higher for the grafted starches with higher percentage grafting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available