4.5 Article

Biomechanical Behavior of a Biomimetic Artificial Intervertebral Disc

Journal

SPINE
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages E367-E373

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326305

Keywords

artificial; axial; biomimetic; creep; disc; hysteresis; spine; stiffness

Funding

  1. Senter Novem
  2. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  3. SenterNovem (Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design. The biomechanical behavior of a biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc (AID) was characterized in vitro in axial compression and compared with natural disc behavior. Objective. To evaluate the strength and durability of a novel biomimetic AID and to demonstrate whether its axial deformation behavior is similar to that of a natural disc. Summary of Background Data. Current clinically used AIDs have reasonable success rates. However, because of their nonphysiological design, spinal mechanics are altered. To avoid long-term complications, a novel biomimetic AID, with a nucleus-annulus structure and osmotic swelling properties has been developed. Methods. Eighteen AIDs in total were tested in axial compression. Six were loaded monotonically to determine strength. Six were tested in fatigue (600-6000 N). Another 6 were used to characterize the axial creep and dynamic behavior (0.01-10 Hz). Creep and dynamic response were also determined for 4 AIDs after fatigue loading. Results. The AIDs remained intact up to 15 kN and 10 million cycles. The creep and dynamic behavior were similar to the natural disc behavior, except for hysteresis, which was 20% to 30% higher. After fatigue, creep decreased from 4% to 1%, stiffness increased 2-fold, and hysteresis was reduced to that for a normal disc. Conclusion. A strong and durable AID design was introduced. Compared with current clinical articulating AIDs, this biomimetic AID introduces the natural disc annulus-nucleus structure, resulting in axial behavior closer to that of the natural disc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available