4.5 Article

Cervical Multilevel Intraspinal Stem Cell Therapy Assessment of Surgical Risks in Gottingen Minipigs

Journal

SPINE
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages E164-E171

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d77a47

Keywords

microinjection; neural stem cells; spinal cord; cell therapy; pigs

Funding

  1. Neuralstem Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design. Assessment of long-term surgical risks from multiple intraspinal cell injections. Objective. To prove that multilevel-targeted cell injection to the spinal cord can be a feasible and safe procedure. Summary of Background Data. Neural cell transplantation has been proposed as a treatment for a variety of neurologic disorders, including degenerative, ischemic, autoimmune, and traumatic etiologies. Among these diseases, the lack of effective treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has prompted the search for cell-based neuroprotection or motor neuron-replacement therapies. Methods. Fifteen female minipigs, divided into 3 experimental groups, underwent either 5 or 10 unilateral injections of neural stem cells or 10 vehicle injections into the C3-C5 segments of the spinal cord, using a device and technique developed for safe and accurate injection into the human spinal cord. All animals received intravenous Tacrolimus (0.025 mg/kg) BID during the course of the study. Sensory and motor functions as well as general morbidity were assessed for 28 days. Full necropsy was performed and spinal cords were analyzed for graft survival. This study was performed under Good Laboratory Practice conditions. Results. Neither mortality nor permanent surgical complications were observed within the 28-day study period. All animals returned to preoperative baseline showing full motor function recovery. Graft survival was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion. Clinically acceptable neural progenitor survival, distribution, and density were achieved using the number of injections and surgical techniques specifically developed for this purpose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available