4.5 Article

Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation The Learning Curve and Evolution in Technique in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Journal

SPINE
Volume 34, Issue 20, Pages 2158-2164

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4f7e8

Keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; learning curve; thoracic pedicle screws

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve and associated evolution in surgical technique with thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Summary of Background Data. Common treatment for AIS now includes posterior spinal fusion, using thoracic pedicle screws (TPS). It is critical to assess the efficacy, safety profile, and learning curve associated with this technique as its use becomes more widespread among inexperienced surgeons. Methods. Retrospective review of the senior author's first 96 TPS cases for Lenke Type I AIS curves. Multiple regression techniques were used to discern whether increasing case number (CN) was associated with improved perioperative and 2-year minimum radiographic and clinical outcomes. The 96 cases were divided into 4 equal quartiles of 24 cases/group (i.e., Q1-Q4) and compared using analysis of variance measures. Results. A total of 1169 thoracic pedicle screws were placed in 96 patients. We found a significant correlation between CN and major curve correction at 2 years (P < 0.0001), inverse correlation between CN and length of stay (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.03), but no differences in cell saver or complications. Univariate analysis revealed significant inverse correlations between increasing CN and transfusion rate (P = 0.02) and operative times (P = 0.0001). Total number of screws placed (Q1: 9.4 vs. Q4: 16.2, P < 0.0001) and number of screws/ level (Q1: 0.98 vs. Q4: 1.64, P < 0.0001) increased linearly with increasing CN, whereas the average time for screw placement (Q1: 24.2 vs. Q4: 11.4 minutes, P < 0.0001) and ability to maintain T2-T12 kyphosis decreased (Q1: 0.21 vs. Q4: -5.5 P = 0.02) with increasing CN. Conclusion. There is a significant learning curve associated with thoracic pedicle screw placement in AIS. We describe several technical steps that can be taken to increase the safety of screw placement at the beginning of the learning curve. Inexperienced surgeons should expect a gradual improvement over time in radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available