Journal
SPINAL CORD
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 438-450Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.164
Keywords
quality of life; spinal cord injuries; outcome assessment; validity; reliability
Categories
Funding
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- SCI Solutions Network
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Study design: A systematic review. Objective: To critically review quality of life (QOL) instruments used with spinal cord injury (SCI) populations. Setting: Vancouver, Canada. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted for publications assessing the measurement properties of QOL outcome measures. Pre-established criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties. Results: Fourteen articles reporting on 13 QOL instruments met the inclusion criteria, including the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM), Quality of Well-being Scale, Qualiveen, Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68), Short Form (SF)-36, SF-36V, SF-12, SF-6D, Quality of Life Index, Quality of Life Profile for Adults with Physical Disabilities (QOLP-PD), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Sense of Well-being Index (SWBI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF). The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF have been widely used and validated. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising with limited investigation. The Qualiveen and PRISM performed well and are specific to SCI complications. Conclusion: The WHOQOL-BREF is presently the most acceptable and established instrument to assess QOL after SCI. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising; however, require further evaluation of their measurement properties. Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 438-450; doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.164; published online 22 December 2009
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available