4.0 Article

A consensus definition of occupation-based intervention from a Malaysian perspective: A Delphi study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Volume 78, Issue 11, Pages 697-705

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0308022615569510

Keywords

Delphi technique; occupations; occupational therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. James Cook University, Australia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Mara (Mara University of Technology), Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Descriptions and definitions for occupation-based intervention vary in the literature. Occupation-based intervention is assumed to be based on occupation and is seen as both a means and an end. Occupation-based intervention also includes all levels of interventions in occupational therapy as long as the goal is occupational performance. Occupation-based intervention can also be described as a therapeutic process that emerges during the therapy session. The purpose of this study was to achieve a consensus definition of occupation-based intervention among Malaysian occupational therapists. Method A three-round Delphi technique using a sequential questionnaire was conducted. Fifteen occupational therapists and occupational therapy educators completed all rounds. The Delphi process began with open-ended questions, asking the participants some questions about occupation-based intervention. The second and third rounds asked participants to rank their agreement with statements about occupation-based intervention. Results Occupation-based intervention is seen by therapists to be both a means and an end, with occupational performance as the main outcome. It is believed that using occupation alone is not enough; preparatory and purposeful methods may have to be incorporated to achieve the outcomes. Conclusion It is important to adopt a common definition of occupation-based intervention in practice and education to signify occupation at the centre of occupational therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available