4.6 Article

Towards the reduction of matrix effects in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry without compromising detection limits: The use of argon-nitrogen mixed-gas plasma

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2010.11.011

Keywords

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Matrix effects; Sheath gas; Mixed gas plasma; Spatial profiling

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Anglo American Exploration Luxembourg Sari

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multivariate optimization of a mixed-gas plasma was conducted in an attempt to find conditions minimizing matrix effects without sacrificing the detection limits that are observed with an all argon plasma optimized for maximum sensitivity in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Compared to the latter, where 49.1 +/- 7.1% (n = 17) analyte signal suppression resulted in the presence of 0.1 M Na, 3.8 +/- 3.2% suppression (and 2.8 +/- 2.1% enhancement in some cases) was observed in the optimized mixed-gas plasma with 0.13% v/v N-2 in the plasma gas and 0.11% in the central channel as a sheath gas around the nebulizer gas flow. Furthermore, improved detection limits were observed for Al, Co, Pd, and V with the optimized mixed-gas plasma compared to an argon plasma at maximum sensitivity. The robustness of this mixed-gas plasma was further demonstrated through the accurate determination of U and Mo in NASS-5 seawater certified reference material using a simple external calibration, without matrix-matching or internal standardization. Indeed, the result obtained for Mo (9.1 +/- 1.9 mu g/L) was within the 95% confidence interval of the certified value of 9.6 +/- 1.0 mu g/L, while that obtained for U (3.0 +/- 0.2 mu g/L) was close to the information value of 2.6 mu g/L Spatial profiling results suggest better energy transfer between the toroidal zone and the central channel in the mixed-gas plasma. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available