4.6 Article

Automatic estimation of varying continuum background emission in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Journal

SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 278-287

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.02.010

Keywords

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; Background estimation; Line overlaps; Polynomial function; Parameter optimization

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences for Key Topics in Innovation Engineering [KGCX2-YW-126]
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2009AA04Z160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), plasma emission is extremely unstable because of many factors, such as the fluctuation of laser energy, inhomogeneity of sample surfaces, and variable distance between lens and samples. Therefore, the detection and correction of varying continuum background emission are not easily accomplished, The aim of this work is to present a method that can automatically estimate and correct varying continuum background emission, which is representative in laser-induced plasma. In this method, we first find all minima on a spectrum, and then deduct the unreasonable minima by a proper threshold. Finally, we use one or multiple polynomial functions through the minima left to approximate the continuum backgrounds. The validity of this method was evaluated by using several spectra with different complexities and wavelength ranges. We also applied this method to optimize the measurement time delays of detectors. In addition, for five aluminum alloy samples, we compared their elemental calibration Cures between original spectra and background-corrected spectra. Experimental results proved that the method proposed in this paper can well estimate varying continuum backgrounds over a wide range of wavelengths. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available