4.6 Article

Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283

Keywords

WOUND MANAGEMENT; HEALTH ECONOMICS

Funding

  1. NIHR Wound Prevention and Treatment Healthcare Technology Co-operative (NIHR WoundTec HTC), Bradford Institute For Health Research, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
  2. 3M Health Care Limited, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
  3. Activa Healthcare Limited, Burton On Trent, Staffordshire, UK
  4. Brightwake Limited, Kirkby In Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, UK
  5. KCI Medical Limited, Crawley, West Sussex, UK
  6. Longhand Data, Welburn, North Yorkshire, UK
  7. Medira Limited, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  8. Molnlycke Health Care Limited, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, UK
  9. Park House Healthcare Limited, Elland, West Yorkshire, UK
  10. Perfectus Biomed Limited, Daresbury, Warrington, UK
  11. Pulsecare Medical LLC, North Andover, Massachusets, USA
  12. Smith & Nephew Medical Limited, Hull, East Riding Of Yorkshire, UK
  13. Sozo Woundcare Limited, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK
  14. Systagenix Wound Management Limited, Gatwick Airport, West Sussex,
  15. Trio Healthcare, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, UK
  16. Urgo Limited, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
  17. Willingsford Limited, Southampton, Hampshire, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To estimate the prevalence of wounds managed by the UK's National Health Service (NHS) in 2012/2013 and the annual levels of healthcare resource use attributable to their management and corresponding costs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database. Records of 1000 adult patients who had a wound in 2012/2013 (cases) were randomly selected and matched with 1000 patients with no history of a wound (controls). Patients' characteristics, wound-related health outcomes and all healthcare resource use were quantified and the total NHS cost of patient management was estimated at 2013/2014 prices. Results Patients' mean age was 69.0years and 45% were male. 76% of patients presented with a new wound in the study year and 61% of wounds healed during the study year. Nutritional deficiency (OR 0.53; p<0.001) and diabetes (OR 0.65; p<0.001) were independent risk factors for non-healing. There were an estimated 2.2 million wounds managed by the NHS in 2012/2013. Annual levels of resource use attributable to managing these wounds and associated comorbidities included 18.6 million practice nurse visits, 10.9 million community nurse visits, 7.7 million GP visits and 3.4 million hospital outpatient visits. The annual NHS cost of managing these wounds and associated comorbidities was 5.3 billion. This was reduced to between 5.1 pound and 4.5 pound billion after adjusting for comorbidities. Conclusions Real world evidence highlights wound management is predominantly a nurse-led discipline. Approximately 30% of wounds lacked a differential diagnosis, indicative of practical difficulties experienced by non-specialist clinicians. Wounds impose a substantial health economic burden on the UK's NHS, comparable to that of managing obesity (5.0 pound billion). Clinical and economic benefits could accrue from improved systems of care and an increased awareness of the impact that wounds impose on patients and the NHS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available