4.6 Review

What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors

Tammy Hoffmann et al.

TRIALS (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews

Pooja Saini et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Intervention Synthesis: A Missing Link between a Systematic Review and Practical Treatment(s)

Paul P. Glasziou et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2014)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Paul Montgomery et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials

Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Systematic reviews identify important methodological flaws in stroke rehabilitation therapy primary studies: review of reviews

Pasqualina Santaguida et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials

Sara Schroter et al.

BMJ OPEN (2012)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Stroke Care 2 Stroke rehabilitation

Peter Langhorne et al.

LANCET (2011)

Article Clinical Neurology

Stroke: Working Toward a Prioritized World Agenda

Vladimir Hachinski et al.

STROKE (2010)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?

Hilda Bastian et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2010)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2009)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2007)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative

Claire Glenton et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)

Article Rehabilitation

Opening the black box of poststroke rehabilitation: Stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes

G DeJong et al.

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2005)

Article Geriatrics & Gerontology

What are the components of effective stroke unit care?

P Langhorne et al.

AGE AND AGEING (2002)