4.5 Review

Recent Advances in Understanding Particle Acceleration Processes in Solar Flares

Journal

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 159, Issue 1-4, Pages 357-420

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-011-9803-y

Keywords

Sun: flares; Sun: X-rays; Sun: acceleration; Sun: energetic particles

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX10AT78G]
  2. UC Berkeley
  3. PPARC/STFC UK
  4. Royal Society
  5. European Commission through the SOLAIRE Network [MTRN-CT-2006-035484]
  6. International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, Switzerland
  7. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
  8. INSU/CNRS
  9. Science Technology and Facility Council (STFC) [PP/E001246/1]
  10. University of St Andrews, UK
  11. NASA [123023, NNX10AT78G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001808/1, ST/F003064/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. STFC [ST/I001808/1, ST/F003064/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review basic theoretical concepts in particle acceleration, with particular emphasis on processes likely to occur in regions of magnetic reconnection. Several new developments are discussed, including detailed studies of reconnection in three-dimensional magnetic field configurations (e. g., current sheets, collapsing traps, separatrix regions) and stochastic acceleration in a turbulent environment. Fluid, test-particle, and particle-in-cell approaches are used and results compared. While these studies show considerable promise in accounting for the various observational manifestations of solar flares, they are limited by a number of factors, mostly relating to available computational power. Not the least of these issues is the need to explicitly incorporate the electrodynamic feedback of the accelerated particles themselves on the environment in which they are accelerated. A brief prognosis for future advancement is offered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available