3.9 Article

Field-Evolved Resistance to Bt Cotton Bollworm in the U S and Pink Bollworm in India

Journal

SOUTHWESTERN ENTOMOLOGIST
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 417-424

Publisher

SOUTHWESTERN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3958/059.035.0326

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. USDA-National Research Initiative [2008-35302-0390]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some field populations of bollworm Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) in the southeastern U S have evolved resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab produced by transgenic cotton Gossypium hirsutum L Decreased susceptibility to Cry1Ac, the toxin in first-generation Bt cotton (Bollgard), was detected in laboratory diet bioassays and was associated with increased survival on Bollgard plant tissues and control problems in the field Bollgard cotton Is no longer registered in the U S and has been replaced primarily by Bt cotton that produces Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab (Bollgard II) Laboratory diet bioassay results showed that the percentage of field populations resistant to Cry2Ab increased from 0% in 2002 to 50% in 2005 In bioassays from 2003 to 2006 14 field-derived strains of bollworm had <50% mortality at 150 mu g Cry2Ab per milliliter of diet the highest toxin concentration tested As with the recently reported resistance of pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), to Bollgard cotton in India, laboratory diet bioassays provide the critical data documenting genetically based decreases in susceptibility of bollworm field populations to Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab Resistance to Bt toxins linked with increased damage to Bt crops in the field has now been documented in at least four target lepidopteran pests Systematic analyses of these cases as well as the many cases in which pests remain susceptible to Bt crops can provide knowledge useful for increasing the durability of current and future generations of transgenic insecticidal crops

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available