3.9 Article

Trapping and capture myopathy in Ludwig's Bustard

Journal

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 16-23

Publisher

SOUTHERN AFRICAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ASSOC
DOI: 10.3957/056.044.0108

Keywords

Neotis ludwigii; noose traps; capture myopathy; guide-lines; Karoo

Funding

  1. Eskom
  2. Mazda Wildlife Fund
  3. Abax Foundation
  4. Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund
  5. Percy FitzPatrick DST/NRF Centre of Excellence
  6. University of Cape Town

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Banding and deploying tracking devices are important techniques to study birds of conservation concern, but require that individuals can be safely and efficiently caught and handled. We describe the trapping techniques used to catch Ludwig's Bustards (Neotis ludwigii) in the Karoo, South Africa, for a satellite tracking programme aiming to better understand the movement biology of this poorly known and threatened bird. Trapping sites on transformed land used as congregation sites were difficult to locate for these nomadic and partially migratory birds, but six of nine prospective trapping trips were successful. Although labour-intensive, extensive deployment of leg nooses coupled with guide-lines to direct birds proved effective. We caught 12 bustards at four sites across the Karoo over 37 trapping days in 2010-2012. Success was male-biased, with only two females caught. Noose traps were safe, with no injuries to captured birds. However, in common with other studies, we encountered problems with capture myopathy after handling five bustards; two subsequently died and three recovered. We designed a 'harnessing chair' to reduce the risk of capture myopathy, but still encountered problems. We recommend noose traps with guide-lines to catch other large, wary birds in open environments where there is some predictability of habitat use, but caution against long handling times and trapping in extreme temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available