4.5 Article

Carbon-doped anatase TiO2 nanotube array/glass and its enhanced photocatalytic activity under solar light

Journal

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 53-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.08.008

Keywords

Anatase TiO2 nanotube arrays; Carbon-doped; Photocatalytic activity; Simulated solar light

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10774121, 10974155, 11264034]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials of Gansu Province [KF-09-02]
  3. Foundation of Northwest Normal University of China [NWNU-LKQN-10-26]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To enhance the photocatalytic activity under solar light, highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNAs) film with anatase phase was fabricated on glass and successfully doped with carbon at various temperatures of 450-550 degrees C. The characterization results indicate that, after carbon doping, the TNAs still remained nanotubular structure with anatase phase. But their optical response shifted from UV to the visible light region and the recombination of photogenerated carriers was suppressed effectively. It is more important that the carbon-doped TNAs/glass (C-TNAs) samples exhibited high solar light photocatalytic activity, and 68%, 61% and 56% MO was photodegraded in 150 min by the C-TNAs calcined at 550, 500 and 450 degrees C, respectively. Especially, the apparent reaction rate constant of C-TNAs calcined at 550 (k, 0.065 min(-1)) with the highest activity is 3.6 times that of pristine anatase TNAs (k, 0.018 min(-1)). It is clear that carbon doping enhanced the photocatalytic activity under sunlight at optimized annealing temperature. The efficient activity could be attributed to the synergetic effects of strong visible light absorption, good crystallization, large surface, and enhanced separation of photoinduced carriers. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available