4.5 Article

Fabrication and magnetic properties of electrospun copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanofibers

Journal

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 479-484

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.06.019

Keywords

Copper ferrite; Nanofibers; Electrospinning; Electron microscopy; X-ray diffraction; Magnetic properties; Nanofabrication

Funding

  1. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC)
  2. NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tetragonal copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning method using a solution that contained poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) and Cu and Fe nitrates as alternative metal sources. The as-spun and calcined CuFe2O4/PVP Composite samples were characterized by TG-DTA, X-ray diffraction, FT-IR, and SEM, respectively. After calcination of the as-spun CuFe2O4/PVP composite nanofibers (fiber size of 89 +/- 12 nm in diameter) at 500 degrees C in air for 2 h, CuFe2O4 nanofibers of 66 13 nm in diameter having well-developed tetragonal structure were successfully obtained. The crystal structure and morphology of the nanofibers were influenced by the calcination temperature. After calcination at 600 and 700 degrees C, the nature of nanofibers changed which was possibly due to the reorganization of the CuFe2O4 structure at high temperature, and a fiber structure of packed particles or crystallites was prominent. Crystallite size of the nanoparticles contained in nanofibers increases from 7.9 to 23.98 nm with increasing calcination temperature between 500 and 700 degrees C. Room temperature magnetization results showed a ferromagnetic behavior of the calcined CuFe2O4 samples, having their specific saturation magnetization (M-s) values of 17.73, 20.52, and 23.98 emu/g for the samples calcined at 500, 600, and 700 degrees C, respectively. (c) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available