4.5 Article

Microstructural characterization and electrical properties of spray pyrolyzed conventionally sintered or hot-pressed BaZrO3 and BaZr0.9Y0.1O3-δ

Journal

SOLID STATE IONICS
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages 32-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.11.032

Keywords

High temperature proton conductors; BaZrO3; Spray pyrolysis; Electrical conductivity

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [158517/431]
  2. FUNMAT@UiO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A spray pyrolysis route to BaZrO3 (BZ) and BaZr0.9Y0.1O2.95 (BZY) powders was developed starting from nitrate solutions. Homogeneous powders with a grain size of similar to 100 nm were achieved. A calcination of the powder was necessary to remove carbonates formed during the spray pyrolysis. Hot pressing was in comparison with conventional sintering more effective to enhance densification and suppress grain growth, and dense (> 96%) materials with homogeneous microstructure were obtained. The Y-substitution decreased the densification rate. Minor amounts of a secondary phase was observed at the grain boundary triple points of BZY, but the grain boundaries were otherwise found to be coherent and without significant secondary phase accumulation. Impedance spectroscopy vs T, pO(2) and pH(2)O of conventionally sintered BZ and hot-pressed BZY demonstrated that the conductivity of BZ was orders of magnitude lower than compared to BZY. The conductivity of BZ displayed mixed proton and p-type electronic conduction characteristics in the grain interior which was depressed at the grain boundaries. The grain boundaries showed an additional n-type electronic conduction under reducing conditions. The conductivity characteristics were according to core-space charge layer theory. BZ seems to exhibit a larger ratio of p-type electronic to protonic conduction as compared to BZY, contrary to the prediction of simple defect chemistry. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available