4.5 Article

Tailoring mixed proton-electronic conductivity of BaZrO3 by Y and Pr co-doping for cathode application in protonic SOFCs

Journal

SOLID STATE IONICS
Volume 202, Issue 1, Pages 30-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.08.019

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Proton conductor; Barium zirconate; Praseodymium; Mixed conductivity

Funding

  1. World Premier International Research Center Initiative of MEXT, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BaZr0.8-xPrxY0.2O3-delta (BZPYX, 0.1 <= x <= 0.4) perovskite oxides were investigated for application as cathode materials for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells based on proton conducting electrolytes (protonic-SOFCs). The BZPYx reactivity with CO2 and water vapor was evaluated by thermogravimetric and X-ray diffraction analyses, and good chemical stability was observed for each BZPYx composition. Conductivity measurements of BZPYx sintered pellets were performed as a function of temperature and po(2) in humidified atmospheres, corresponding to cathode operating condition in protonic-SOFCs. Different conductivity values and activation energies were measured depending on the Pr content, suggesting the presence of different. charge carriers. For all the compositions, the partial electronic conductivity, calculated from conductivity measurements at different po2, increased with increasing the temperature from 500 to 700 degrees C. Furthermore, the larger the Pr content, the larger the electronic conductivity. BaZr0.7Pr0.1Y0.2O3-delta and BaZr0.4Pr0.4Y0.2O3-delta showed mostly pure proton and electron conductivity, respectively, whereas the intermediate compositions showed mixed proton/electronic conductivity. Among the two mixed proton/electronic conductors, BaZr0.6Pr0.3Y0.2O3-delta presented the larger conductivity, which coupled with its good chemical stability, makes this perovskite oxide a candidate cathode materials for protonic-SOFCs. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available