4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Orbital fluctuation theory in iron-based superconductors: s++-wave superconductivity, structure transition, and impurity-induced nematic order

Journal

SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 152, Issue 8, Pages 718-727

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2012.01.012

Keywords

Iron-based superconductors; Structure transition; Orbital fluctuation; Superconductivity; Shear modulus softening

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20102008, 22740222] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main features in iron-based superconductors would be (i) the orthorhombic transition accompanied by remarkable softening of shear modulus, (ii) high-T-c superconductivity close to the orthorhombic phase, and (iii) nematic transition in the tetragonal phase. In this paper, we present a unified explanation for them, based on the orbital fluctuation theory, considering both the e-ph and the Coulomb interaction. It is found that a small e-phonon coupling constant (lambda similar to 0.2) is enough to produce large orbital (= charge quadrupole O-xz/yz) fluctuations, which causes the s-wave superconductivity without sign reversal (s(++)-wave state). The derived orbital fluctuations also cause the instability toward the structure transition due to the bound state formation of two orbitons with opposite momenta, which is called the two-orbiton process. Moreover, impurity-induced non-local orbital order with C-2-symmetry is obtained when the orbital fluctuations are strong. This impurity-induced nematic state explains the in-plane anisotropy of resistivity in detwinned samples. We stress that (i)-(iii) are reproducible only when orbital fluctuations with respect to O-xz and O-yz charge quadrupoles are the most divergent. This fact ensures the reliability of the present model Hamiltonian and calculation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available