4.4 Article

Band topology and the quantum spin Hall effect in bilayer graphene

Journal

SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 151, Issue 16, Pages 1075-1083

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2011.05.016

Keywords

Graphene nanoribbons; Heterostructures; Electronic properties; Transport properties

Funding

  1. MICINN-Spain [FIS2009-08744, FIS2008-00124]
  2. NSF [DMR-1005035]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1005035] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider bilayer graphene in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, in order to assess its behavior as a topological insulator. The first Chern number n for the energy bands of single-layer graphene and that for the energy bands of bilayer graphene are computed and compared. It is shown that for a given valley and spin, n for a Bernal-stacked bilayer is doubled with respect to that for the monolayer. This implies that this form of bilayer graphene will have twice as many edge states as single-layer graphene, which we confirm with numerical calculations and analytically in the case of an armchair terminated surface. Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene is a weak topological insulator, whose surface spectrum is susceptible to gap opening under spin-mixing perturbations. We assess the stability of the associated topological bulk state of bilayer graphene under various perturbations. In contrast, we show that AA-stacked bilayer graphene is not a topological insulator unless the spin-orbit coupling is bigger than the interlayer hopping. Finally, we consider an intermediate situation in which only one of the two layers has spin-orbit coupling, and find that although individual valleys have non-trivial Chern numbers for the case of Bernal stacking, the spectrum as a whole is not gapped, so the system is not a topological insulator. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available