4.3 Article

Spatial Distribution of Solar Energetic Particles in the Inner Heliosphere

Journal

SOLAR PHYSICS
Volume 285, Issue 1-2, Pages 233-250

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-012-0038-1

Keywords

Solar energetic particles; Shock waves; Coronal mass ejections

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX08AQ02G, NNX09AU98G]
  2. Office of Naval Research
  3. NASA DPR [NNG06EC55I]
  4. NASA [95188, NNX09AU98G, 105876, NNX08AQ02G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the spatial distribution of solar energetic particles (SEPs) throughout the inner heliosphere during six large SEP events from the period 1977 through 1979, as deduced from observations on the Helios 1 and 2, IMP 7 and 8, ISEE 3, and Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft. Evidence of intensity maxima associated with the expanding shock wave is commonly seen along its central and western flanks, although the region of peak acceleration or nose of the shock is sometimes highly localized in longitude. In one event (1 January 1978) a sharp peak in 20 -aEuro parts per thousand 30 MeV proton intensities is seen more strongly by Voyager at similar to aEuro parts per thousand 2 AU than it is by spacecraft at nearby longitudes at similar to aEuro parts per thousand 1 AU. Large spatial regions, or reservoirs, often exist behind the shocks with spatially uniform SEP intensities and invariant spectra that decrease adiabatically with time as their containment volume expands. Reservoirs are seen to sweep past 0.3 AU and can extend out many AU. Boundaries of the reservoirs can vary with time and with particle velocity, rather than rigidity. In one case, a second shock wave from the Sun reaccelerates protons that retain the same hard spectrum as protons in the reservoir from the preceding SEP event. Thus reservoirs can provide not only seed particles but also a seed spectrum with a spectral shape that is unchanged by a weaker second shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available