4.3 Article

Combined Analysis of Ultraviolet and Radio Observations of the 7 May 2004 CME/Shock Event

Journal

SOLAR PHYSICS
Volume 273, Issue 2, Pages 511-523

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-011-9770-1

Keywords

Sun: radio radiation; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Shock waves; Line: profiles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report results from the combined analysis of UV and radio observations of a CME-driven shock observed on 7 May 2004 above the southeast limb of the Sun at 1.86 R (aS (TM)) with the Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer (UVCS) on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). The coronal mass ejection (CME) was first detected in white-light by the SOHO's Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C2 telescope and shock-associated type II metric emission was recorded simultaneously by ground-based radio spectrographs. The shock speed (similar to aEuro parts per thousand 690 km s(-1)), as deduced from the analysis of the type II emission drift in the radio spectra and the pre-shock local electron density estimated with the diagnostics provided by UVCS observations of the O vi lambda lambda 1031.9, 1037.6 doublet line intensities, is just a factor similar to aEuro parts per thousand 0.1 higher than the CME speed inferred by means of the white-light (and EUV) data in the middle corona. The local magnetosonic speed, computed from a standard magnetic field model, was estimated as high as similar to aEuro parts per thousand 600 km s(-1), implying that the CME speed was probably just sufficient to drive a weak fast-mode MHD shock ahead of the front. Simultaneously with the type II radio emission, significant changes in the O vi doublet line intensities and profiles were recorded in the UVCS spectra and found compatible with abrupt post-shock plasma acceleration and modest ion heating. This work provides further evidence for the CME-driven origin of the shocks observed in the middle corona.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available