4.3 Article

Acceleration of Relativistic Protons During the 20 January 2005 Flare and CME

Journal

SOLAR PHYSICS
Volume 257, Issue 2, Pages 305-322

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-009-9377-y

Keywords

Coronal mass ejections; Cosmic rays, solar; Energetic particles, acceleration; Energetic particles, propagation; Flares

Funding

  1. French Polar Institute IPEV
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-105435/1, 200020-113704/1]
  3. Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research [C05.0034]
  4. High Altitude Research Stations Jungfraujoch and Gornergrat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The origin of relativistic solar protons during large flare/CME events has not been uniquely identified so far. We perform a detailed comparative analysis of the time profiles of relativistic protons detected by the worldwide network of neutron monitors at Earth with electromagnetic signatures of particle acceleration in the solar corona during the large particle event of 20 January 2005. The intensity -aEuro parts per thousand time profile of the relativistic protons derived from the neutron monitor data indicates two successive peaks. We show that microwave, hard X-ray, and gamma-ray emissions display several episodes of particle acceleration within the impulsive flare phase. The first relativistic protons detected at Earth are accelerated together with relativistic electrons and with protons that produce pion-decay gamma rays during the second episode. The second peak in the relativistic proton profile at Earth is accompanied by new signatures of particle acceleration in the corona within a parts per thousand 1R (aS (TM)) above the photosphere, revealed by hard X-ray and microwave emissions of low intensity and by the renewed radio emission of electron beams and of a coronal shock wave. We discuss the observations in terms of different scenarios of particle acceleration in the corona.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available