4.3 Article

Is Null-Point Reconnection Important for Solar Flux Emergence?

Journal

SOLAR PHYSICS
Volume 260, Issue 2, Pages 299-320

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-009-9458-y

Keywords

Sun: magnetic fields; MHD; Sun: atmosphere; Sun: corona; Plasmas; Methods: numerical

Funding

  1. European Commission through the SOLAIRE Network
  2. St. Andrews Solar Group STFC Rolling Grant
  3. STFC [PP/E001122/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001122/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of null-point reconnection in a three-dimensional numerical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model of solar emerging flux is investigated. The model consists of a twisted magnetic flux tube rising through a stratified convection zone and atmosphere to interact and reconnect with a horizontal overlying magnetic field in the atmosphere. Null points appear as the reconnection begins and persist throughout the rest of the emergence, where they can be found mostly in the model photosphere and transition region, forming two loose clusters on either side of the emerging flux tube. Up to 26 nulls are present at any one time, and tracking in time shows that there is a total of 305 overall, despite the initial simplicity of the magnetic field configuration. We find evidence for the reality of the nulls in terms of their methods of creation and destruction, their balance of signs, their long lifetimes, and their geometrical stability. We then show that due to the low parallel electric fields associated with the nulls, null-point reconnection is not the main type of magnetic reconnection involved in the interaction of the newly emerged flux with the overlying field. However, the large number of nulls implies that the topological structure of the magnetic field must be very complex and the importance of reconnection along separators or separatrix surfaces for flux emergence cannot be ruled out.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available