4.7 Article

Inverted polymer solar cells including ZnO electron transport layer fabricated by facile spray pyrolysis

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 139-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.05.062

Keywords

Inverted polymer solar cell; Electron transport layers; ZnO; Spray pyrolysis

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [12A12852361]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient inverted polymer solar cells (PSCs) were fabricated with ZnO electron transport layers (ETLs) prepared by spray pyrolysis, which is a simple and cost efficient method producing a thin oxide layer by direct spray of precursor on hot substrate. To investigate the effect of substrate temperature on the structural and optical properties as well as performance of PSCs, ZnO ETLs were fabricated by spray pyrolysis on hot substrate controlled at 150, 250, and 350 degrees C, respectively. The PSC with ZnO prepared by spray pyrolysis at 150 degrees C exhibited poor power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 0.94% due to the mismatched energy level and microscopic roughness of ZnO ETL. On the other hand, enhanced efficiency of 2.99% and 3.22% was obtained by using ZnO prepared by spray pyrolysis at 250 and 350 degrees C, respectively. Enhancement of efficiency at higher temperature is attributed to better matching of ZnO coated ITO work-function with the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level of PCBM and the formation of smooth and homogeneous polycrystalline ZnO, resulting in improved interfacial property and electron transport. In the durability test, inverted ZnO solar cell was retained above 80% during 9 days in an ambient atmosphere without any encapsulation, while conventional solar cells showed dramatic decrease of efficiency. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available