4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of copper zinc tin chalcogenide nanoparticles: Influence of reactants on the chemical composition

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 87-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.025

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Copper zinc tin sulfide; CZTS; Copper zinc tin selenide; CZTSe; Chemical composition

Funding

  1. Christian Doppler Research Association (CDG)
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth (BMWFJ)
  3. Isovoltaic AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticles of copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS, Cu2ZnSnS4) and copper zinc tin selenide (CZTSe. Cu2ZnSnSe4) were prepared by a synthesis route using corresponding metal salts and sulfur or selenium. Oleylamine was used as solvent and capping agent. This fast and uncomplicated preparation method delivers amine-capped nanoparticles with a diameter of approximately 7-35 nm depending on the reaction conditions, whereas CZTSe nanoparticles are bigger than similarly synthesized CZTS nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are characterized by powder-X-ray diffraction, mass spectrometry, transmission electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy, electron diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. For CZTS the chemical composition - proven by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy - is in good accordance with the stoichiometric chemical composition, while in the case of CZTSe the chemical composition depends strongly on the metal salts used for the synthesis. A composition close to the stoichiometric one was achieved by selecting metal salts with appropriate reactivity. Transmission electron microscopy images, as well as high resolution transmission electron microscopy images, reveal perfect crystals for the CZTS sample, in the CZTSe samples defects in the crystal structure are observed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available