4.7 Article

Analysis of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin-film solar cells by means of electron microscopy

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 1452-1462

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.008

Keywords

Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)(2) solar cells; Electron microscopy; Electron backscatter diffraction; Electron-beam-induced current; Electron energy-loss spectroscopy; Electron holography

Funding

  1. German ministry for environment (BMU) [0327559H]
  2. German ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [033F0359C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work gives an overview of how electron microscopy and its related techniques are used to analyze individual layers and their interfaces in Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)(2) thin-film solar cells. Imaging of samples can be performed at scales of down to the (sub)angstroms range. At similar spatial resolutions, information on composition can be gathered by means of energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and on spatial distributions of electrostatic Coulomb potentials in the specimen by applying electron holography. Microstructural and compositional properties as well as charge-carrier collection and radiative recombination behavior of the individual layers are accessible by use of electron backscatter diffraction, EDX, electron-beam-induced current (ERIC) and cathodoluminescence measurements, available in scanning electron microscopy. The present contribution gives an overview of the various scanning and transmission electron microscopy techniques applied on Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)(2) thin-film solar cells, examples from case studies, and also demonstrates how these techniques may be combined in order to improve the analysis. Particularly, EBIC results show a reduced charge-carrier collection at Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 grain boundaries, while no indication was found for a charge accumulation at the grain boundaries by electron holography. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available