4.7 Article

Preparation of Zn-In-S film electrodes using chemical bath deposition for photoelectrochemical applications

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 1137-1145

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.02.049

Keywords

Chemical synthesis; Photoelectrode; Optical property; Photocurrent density

Funding

  1. Chang Gung University in Taiwan [UERPD280271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ternary zinc-indium-sulfide film electrodes were fabricated on fluorine doped tin oxide coated glass substrates using chemical bath deposition. New procedures for the growth of Zn-In-S films are presented. The physical and photoelectrochemical properties of the samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM). UV-vis spectroscopy, and a potentiostat. The XRD patterns and SEM images of samples reveal that the samples changed from the cubic ZnIn2S4 phase with lamellar microstructures to the cubic In2S3 phase with irregular platelet microstructures when the [Zn]/[In] molar ratio was decreased in precursor solutions. The thicknesses, direct and indirect band gaps of the samples, determined from the surface profile measurement and transmittance and reflectance spectra, are in the ranges of 1135-1714 nm, 2.47-2.74 eV and 1.88-2.11 eV, respectively. All samples were n-type semiconductors. The flat band potentials of the samples in 0.6 M K2SO3 solution (pH = 9.5), determined from Mott-Schottky plots, lie in the range of -0.58 to -0.45 V vs. the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). The maximum photocurrent density of samples obtained in this study was 0.67 mA/cm(2) at an external potential of +0.5 V vs. an Ag/AgCl electrode in contact with 0.6 M K2SO3 solution under illumination using a 300W Xe lamp system with the light intensity set at 100 mW/cm(2). Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available