4.6 Article

Design of two novel hole transport materials via replacing the core of spiro-OMeTAD with tetrathiafulvalene and tetraazafulvalene for application in perovskite solar cells

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 132-138

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.047

Keywords

Hole transport materials; Tetrathiafulvalene; Tetraazafulvalene; Cost effective; DFT/TD-DFT; Perovskite solar cells

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Tabriz and its computational center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two novel hole transport materials (HTMs) were designed by way of replacing the core of 2,2',7,7'-tetrakis-(N,N-di-4-methoxyphenylamino)-9,9'spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) with tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and tetraazafulvalene (TAF). The frontier orbitals, stability and solubility, reorganization energy, and hole mobility of the new materials were investigated via density functional theory (DFT) calculations in combination with the Marcus hopping model. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) was also used for evaluating the optical properties including the absorption and emission spectra. It was found that the HOMO level of the two proposed HTMs (-5.25 and -5.20 eV) is lower than that of spiro-OMeTAD ( -5.17 eV). The results showed that the maximum absorption band of the new designed HTMs with the TTF and TAF cores is blue and red-shifted compared to spiro-OMeTAD. This may indicate that these materials have no competition with the perovskite in absorbing light. Additionally, the hole reorganization energy is less than the electron reorganization energy for our structures, revealing these materials can act as HTMs more efficiently than electron transport materials. The calculated hole mobility of TAF- and TTF- OMeTAD was obtained as 4.41 x 10(-4) and 1.15 x 10(-6) cm(2) v(-1) s(-1), respectively. This result indicates that TAF-OMeTAD shows a great potential for use as an alternative HTM for expensive spiro-OMeTAD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available