4.6 Article

Probabilistic forecasting of day-ahead solar irradiance using quantile gradient boosting

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 313-327

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.071

Keywords

Probabilistic prediction; Solar irradiance forecasting; Statistical learning; NWP post-processing

Categories

Funding

  1. Singapore Economic and Development Board (EDB) under the Weather Intelligence for Renewable Energy [EIRP07]
  2. National University of Singapore (NUS) Young Investigator Award Grant [NUSYIA_FY16_P16, R-155-000-180-133]
  3. AcRF Tier 2 Grant [R155-000-183]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the chaotic nature of the underlying physical processes, even state-of-the-art models cannot perfectly forecast the solar irradiance at the surface of the earth. There is, therefore, a growing interest in the research community for forecasting methods that can quantify their own uncertainty. This paper proposes a novel probabilistic framework for forecasting day-ahead hourly solar irradiance. A principal component analysis (PCA) is used to tightly combine a high-resolution mesoscale numerical weather prediction (NWP) model with a quantile gradient boosting algorithm. A thorough evaluation of the deterministic and probabilistic properties of the model is conducted for a full year in the tropical island of Singapore. The impact of the sky conditions on its performance is also considered. Furthermore, a rigorous statistical framework is employed to systematically benchmark our model against two state of the art methods, a Lasso model output statistic procedure and an analog ensemble (AnEn). Our model significantly improves the numerical weather prediction model: it achieves a 41% reduction of the MAE and 39% reduction of the RMSE. It is also slightly more accurate than Lasso and has a CRPS 4% lower than that of AnEn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available