4.6 Article

Solar light induced photocatalytic degradation of Reactive Blue 220 (RB-220) dye with highly efficient Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanoparticles: A comparison with UV photocatalysis

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 67-76

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.032

Keywords

Ag@TiO2 core shell nanoparticles; Photocatalysis; UV light; Solar light irradiation

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ag core-TiO2 shell (Ag@TiO2) structured nanoparticles with Ag to TiO2 molar ratio of 1:1.7 were synthesized using one pot synthesis method and post calcination was carried out at 450 degrees C for 3 h to convert it from amorphous to crystalline form. The Ag core and TiO2 shell formation was confirmed by TEM and AFM. The particle size analysis revealed the average size of Ag@TiO2 as approximately around 30 nm. EDS spectra showed the presence of O, Ag, and Ti elements. The improvement in optical properties was proved by DRS which showed significant red shift by Ag core in visible region. Ag@TiO2 exhibited better photocatalytic activity as compared to Degussa P25-TiO2, synthesized TiO2, and the Ag doped TiO2 photocatalysts under UV and solar light irradiation for degradation of Reactive Blue 220 (RB-220) dye. Higher rate of photocatalysis of RB-220 with Ag@TiO2, was obtained under solar light irradiation as compared to UV light irradiation, confirming the capability of the catalyst to absorb both UV and visible light. The kinetics of degradation of dye was found to follow modified Langmuir Hinshelwood (L-H) kinetic model. Ag@TiO2 can be recycled without much decline in the efficacy. Ag@TiO2 has been found to be the effective photocatalyst for degradation of water contaminated with azo dyes under both UV and solar light irradiations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available