4.6 Article

Reduction reactivity of CeO2-ZrO2 oxide under high O2 partial pressure in two-step water splitting process

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 85, Issue 9, Pages 2321-2330

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.06.019

Keywords

Concentrated solar heat; Hydrogen production; Two-step water splitting reaction; Cerium oxides; O-2 release in air

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21246147] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The O-2-releasing reaction under the air with the reactive ceramics of CeO2-ZrO2 oxides which can be applied to solar hydrogen production via a two-step water splitting cycle using concentrated solar thermal energy was investigated. CeO2 ZrO2 oxides were synthesized by polymerized complex method at different Ce:Zr molar ratio. The solid solubility of ZrO2 in fluorite structure of CeO2 was in good agreement with the initial content of Zr ions at the preparation in CeO2 ZrO2 oxide. The O-2-releasing reaction in air with CeO2-ZrO2 oxides was studied. Different solid solubility (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%) of ZrO2 in CeO2 were examined. The amount of O-2 gas evolved in the reaction with Ce1-xZrxO2 (0 <= x <= 0.3) solid solutions was more than that with CeO2, and the largest yield of 2.9 cm(3)/g was exhibited at x = 0.2 (Ce0.8Zr0.2O2) for an O-2 release at 1500 degrees C in air. The reduced cerium ion in Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 was about 11%, which is seven times higher than that with CeO2. The optical absorption and luminescence spectra of the CeO2-ZrO2 oxide obtained before and after the O-2-releasing reaction suggest that the reduction of Ce4+ with formation of oxygen defect in the air. The enhancement of the O-2-releasing reaction with CeO2-ZrO2 oxide is found to be caused by an introduction of Zr4+, which has smaller ionic radius than Ce3+ or Ce4+, in the fluorite structure. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available