4.5 Article

Remediation of a mine soil with insoluble polyacrylate polymers enhances soil quality and plant growth

Journal

SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 350-356

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00173.x

Keywords

Orchardgrass; mine soils; polyacrylate polymers; remediation; soil quality; enzymatic activities

Categories

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PPCDT/AMB/57586/2004]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/21430/2005]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/21430/2005] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effects of different application rates of insoluble hydrophilic polyacrylate polymers on plant growth and soil quality from a Pb-contaminated mine soil. The polymer increased the water-holding capacity of the soil from about 250 g/kg in unamended soil to almost 1000 g/kg in soil with 0.6% polymer. However, the capacity of the polymer to retain water decreased progressively, presumably as the polymer sorbed Pb. Growth of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L. cv. Amba) was stimulated in the polymer-amended soil. The greatest accumulated biomass over four cuts was obtained in soil amended with 0.4% of polymer. After orchardgrass had been growing for 101 days, the amounts of CaCl2-extractable Pb present in the polymer-amended soil were 15-66% of those in the unamended soil, depending on polymer application rate. The number of bacteria culturable on agar enriched with 'Nutrient' and yeast extract, and the activities of dehydrogenase, phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, protease and cellulase increased following polymer application. In contrast, urease activity was impaired by polymer application, presumably due to the presence of ammonium as a counter ion. Principal component analysis was used to compare the effects of the different rates of polymer application. Overall, the application of 0.2 or 0.4% polymer resulted in closer values for the indicators of soil quality used than the treatment with 0.6% polymer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available