4.7 Article

The impact of logging residue on soil GHG fluxes in a drained peatland forest

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.01.005

Keywords

Drained peatland; Clearfelling; Logging residue; GHG; N2O; Soil respiration; Heterotrophic respiration; Priming

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
  2. Ministry of Trade and Industry
  3. Ministry of the Environment
  4. Finnish Cultural Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Northern peatlands contain substantial reservoirs of carbon (C). Forestry activities endanger the C storages in some of these areas. While the initial impacts of forestry drainage on peatland greenhouse gas (GHG) balance have been studied, the impacts of other silvicultural practices, e.g. logging residue (LR) retention or removal, are not known. We measured the CH4, N2O and CO2 fluxes between peat soil and atmosphere with and without decomposing LR over three (2002-2004) seasons (May-Oct) following clearfelling in a drained peatland forest, along with the mass loss of LR. Seasonal average CO2 efflux from plots with LR (3070 g CO2 m(-2) season(-1)) was twice as high as that from plots without LR (1447 g CO2 m(-2) season(-1)). Less than 40% of this difference was accounted for by the decay of logging residues (530 g CO2 m(-2) season(-1)), so the majority of the increased CO2 efflux was caused by increased soil organic matter decomposition under the LR. Furthermore LR increased soil N2O fluxes over 3-fold (0.70 g N2O m(-2) season(-1)), compared to plots without LR (019 g N2O m(-2) season(-1)), while no change in CH4 emissions was observed. Our results indicate that LR retention in clearfelled peatland sites may significantly increase GHG emissions and C release from the soil organic matter C storage. This would make the harvesting of LR for biofuel more beneficial, in the form of avoided emissions. Further investigations of the sources of CO2 under logging residues are, however, needed to confirm this finding. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available